Section classification
How EN 1993-1-1 Table 5.2 classifies a steel section, why the class depends on the combination, and what the check does with shapes it cannot classify.
Design checks 5 min read
Before a steel cross-section can be checked, EN 1993-1-1 asks which class it is. The class decides whether the resistance is plastic or elastic, and therefore which modulus the check divides the moment by. Getting it wrong in the optimistic direction costs about 10 to 15% for an I-section bent about its strong axis, and up to 50% about its weak axis, where is about 1.5.
The four classes
| Class | Behaviour | Bending resistance uses |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Forms a plastic hinge with the rotation capacity plastic analysis needs | |
| 2 | Reaches the plastic moment, but local buckling limits rotation | |
| 3 | Reaches yield in the extreme fibre; local buckling prevents the plastic moment | |
| 4 | Local buckling before yield in one or more parts | — an effective section |
Classes 1 and 2 give the same cross-section resistance in this module; the distinction matters for plastic global analysis, which is not in this release. Class 3 gives the elastic resistance. Class 4 is verified on an effective section to EN 1993-1-5 §4.4, for doubly symmetric I and H and rectangular hollow sections.
Where the limits come from
A section is classified by its compressed parts. Each flange outstand and each internal web panel is compared, as a width-to-thickness ratio , against a limit that scales with
Higher-strength steel gets a smaller and therefore tighter limits: a section that is Class 1 in S235 can be Class 2 or 3 in S460 with no change to its geometry.
| (MPa) | 235 | 275 | 355 | 420 | 460 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.81 | 0.75 | 0.71 |
Table 5.2 for doubly symmetric I and H sections
Internal compression parts (the web of an I-section):
| Stress distribution | Class 1 | Class 2 | Class 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pure bending | |||
| Pure compression | |||
| Bending and compression | Between the two, by (plastic) or (elastic) |
Outstand flanges (half the flange width less the root radius and half the web):
| Stress distribution | Class 1 | Class 2 | Class 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Uniform compression |
is the flat width of the part (for a rolled section, the web depth between the fillets and the flange outstand beyond the fillet) and its thickness. The section is the class of its worst part.
Worked example
IPE 400 in S355: , , , , mm.
Web, pure bending:
Flange:
Class 1 in bending. In pure compression the web's Class 1 limit is , and 38.5 exceeds even the Class 3 limit of . The same section is Class 4 in pure compression, which is one reason columns are usually H-sections, not I-sections.
Classification depends on the combination
The web limits depend on the stress distribution across the web, which depends on the ratio of axial force to moment, and that ratio differs in every load combination. The same member can be Class 1 under a bending-led combination and Class 3 under a compression-led one.
Elementarium classifies at every station, for every combination, and the check reports the worst class encountered. The utilisation at each station uses the class at that station under that combination; the reported class is the summary, not the input. See Steel — EN 1993-1-1.
What the module classifies
| Section | How |
|---|---|
| Doubly symmetric I and H | Table 5.2, from the outline dimensions in the section definition |
| Rectangular hollow and welded box | Table 5.2, with the flat width |
| Solid rectangular and circular | Class 1 by definition — no slender part exists |
| Everything else | Verified elastically as Class 3, with a message saying so |
Channels, angles, tees, circular hollow sections and built-up shapes are not classified in this release. The module uses the elastic resistance instead of guessing: conservative for a section that is really Class 1 or 2, correct for Class 3, unconservative for Class 4, and flagged on the check.
AISC
AISC 360 has its own version of the same idea (compact, noncompact and slender, from Table B4.1), with the same purpose and different limits. The Chapter F flexural strengths in the AISC module depend on it in the same way.
Reading the trace
Every utilisation expands to show the classification it used alongside the other intermediate values. If the class is not what you expected, work the ratios by hand as above. It takes a minute, and a disagreement over one width-to-thickness ratio is a much shorter argument than one over a utilisation.
Related
Steel — EN 1993-1-1 for the checks the class feeds; National annexes for the every resistance is divided by.
Something wrong or unclear on this page? Tell us, and it gets corrected.